Skip to content

Module 1 Reflection Questions — Cosmology and the Divine Origin of the Grahas

(For your journal, not a graded exercise — see your Research Journal. No single right answer. These are module-level: they ask you to hold Ch. 1 and Ch. 2 together, not to repeat either lesson's own Workbook reflection questions §6, which stay at the single-chapter level.)

  1. Module 1 rests everything that follows on one premise: a graha can "signify" a life only because it carries a predominance of paramātmā-aṁśa (Ch. 1), a claim Ch. 2 then makes concrete by naming which incarnation each graha carries. Suppose a fellow student argued: "This is theology bolted onto astrology — the real, useful work only starts in Chapter 3, where planetary nature is actually described." Using the specific reasoning BPHS itself lays out across both chapters — not your own opinion of the theology — argue for or against that objection. What, specifically, would a student misunderstand in Module 2 onward if they had skipped straight to Chapter 3?

  2. Ch. 2 grades the nine grahas into four Pūrṇāvatāras and five carrying some jīvāṁśa admixture. Now that you hold both chapters together: does that grading give you any textual basis for expecting a "complete" avatāra-graha (Sun, Moon, Mars, Rahu) to function differently in a chart than a partial one (Mercury, Jupiter, Venus, Saturn, Ketu) — or does BPHS's own Ch. 1–2 text simply not address that question? Answer plainly, citing what does or doesn't support you, and explain in your own words why it would be a mistake to answer this the same way you'd answer a question about planetary strength (Shadbala, Ch. 29).

  3. Ch. 1 spends nearly all of its verses on cosmology — the Sāṅkhya evolution chain, the three guṇas, the three Śaktis — before the grahas are named at all, while Ch. 2 is almost entirely a direct list of nine pairings. Why might Parashara have needed that long philosophical run-up before he could simply hand you a list? What is lost if a student memorizes Ch. 2's nine pairings correctly but cannot explain how Ch. 1 makes that list necessary rather than arbitrary?

  4. Of the eight Module Objectives in Module 1 — Cosmology and the Divine Origin of the Grahas, which one would you be least confident defending if someone questioned you on it right now — not recalling it, but defending it under follow-up questions? What specifically makes that one harder than the rest, and what will you do before starting Module 2 to close the gap?


◀ Module Review · Module Assessment ▶